The difference here is that I don't have a fix...

2010-08-29T17:16:18.983+01:00

The difference here is that I don't have a fixed number of sources, a fixed output type or fixed properties to which the values will be assigned. Also, I don't think it's possible to represent an aggregate in query expression syntax.

This is one of the few places where I find it clea...

2010-08-29T02:41:33.092+01:00

This is one of the few places where I find it clearer to use the from...select LINQ style:

Try:

var ints = new[] { 1, 2, 3 };
var stra = new[] { "hello", "world" };
var strb = new[] { "foo", "bar" };

var sets =
from i in ints
from a in stra
from b in strb
select new Blah
{
Integer = i,
StringA = a,
StringB = b
};

Comments on Derek says:: Aggregate full outer join in LINQ

The difference here is that I don't have a fix...

This is one of the few places where I find it clea...